<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 322 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327341</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the land sold by the assessee was agricultural land and not a capital asset under section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act, exempting it from capital gains tax. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order of the Ld. CIT(A) was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 322 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327341</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the land sold by the assessee was agricultural land and not a capital asset under section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act, exempting it from capital gains tax. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order of the Ld. CIT(A) was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>