<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 318 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327337</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to exclude 90% of the net income from rental and lease activities if assessed as business income for computing the deduction under section 80HHC. If not assessed as business income, such incomes should not be considered for the deduction. The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to reevaluate the rental income issue based on earlier directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:39:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 318 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327337</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to exclude 90% of the net income from rental and lease activities if assessed as business income for computing the deduction under section 80HHC. If not assessed as business income, such incomes should not be considered for the deduction. The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to reevaluate the rental income issue based on earlier directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>