<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 314 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327333</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s findings well-reasoned and based on factual and legal points, hence no interference was necessary. Both appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed based on the consistent findings and decisions made in the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:39:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 314 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327333</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s findings well-reasoned and based on factual and legal points, hence no interference was necessary. Both appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed based on the consistent findings and decisions made in the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>