<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 313 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327332</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, holding that the assessee is entitled to the deduction under section 80IB(10) for the completed portion of the housing project. The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and directed the Assessing Officer to allow the prorata deduction under section 80IB(10) for the completed units, emphasizing the legislative intent to permit deductions for finished segments of a project.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:39:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 313 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327332</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, holding that the assessee is entitled to the deduction under section 80IB(10) for the completed portion of the housing project. The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and directed the Assessing Officer to allow the prorata deduction under section 80IB(10) for the completed units, emphasizing the legislative intent to permit deductions for finished segments of a project.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>