<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 312 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327331</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the order of the ld.CIT under section 263 for disallowance under section 80IB(10) was successful. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the disallowance of deduction under section 80IB(10) due to exceeding commercial space was not justified. The interpretation of section 80IB(10) regarding commercial construction in housing projects was crucial, and the court supported the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction. Additionally, the court clarified that projects approved before 31.3.2005 but completed after 1.4.2005 were not subject to section 80IB(10)(d), leading to the restoration of the assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 312 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327331</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the order of the ld.CIT under section 263 for disallowance under section 80IB(10) was successful. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the disallowance of deduction under section 80IB(10) due to exceeding commercial space was not justified. The interpretation of section 80IB(10) regarding commercial construction in housing projects was crucial, and the court supported the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction. Additionally, the court clarified that projects approved before 31.3.2005 but completed after 1.4.2005 were not subject to section 80IB(10)(d), leading to the restoration of the assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>