<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 309 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327328</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for further verification and directed the appellant to provide clarification on clerical errors in invoices related to rental services. The Tribunal emphasized that Cenvat credit should not be denied due to such errors, allowing the appeal by remand for a reasoned order within 90 days. The appellant was granted an opportunity for a hearing to resolve the issue of Cenvat credit disallowance on rental services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 309 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327328</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for further verification and directed the appellant to provide clarification on clerical errors in invoices related to rental services. The Tribunal emphasized that Cenvat credit should not be denied due to such errors, allowing the appeal by remand for a reasoned order within 90 days. The appellant was granted an opportunity for a hearing to resolve the issue of Cenvat credit disallowance on rental services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>