<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1105 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182365</link>
    <description>The Court balanced equities by directing a fresh hearing and prompt orders under Regulation 19 of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulation, 2013, after noting significant delays. The Commissioner was instructed to conduct a hearing within a week and pass orders within two weeks thereafter, ensuring procedural fairness and timely resolution. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions to address the delay in passing a confirming or revoking order after the initial hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 May 2016 17:23:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1105 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182365</link>
      <description>The Court balanced equities by directing a fresh hearing and prompt orders under Regulation 19 of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulation, 2013, after noting significant delays. The Commissioner was instructed to conduct a hearing within a week and pass orders within two weeks thereafter, ensuring procedural fairness and timely resolution. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions to address the delay in passing a confirming or revoking order after the initial hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>