<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1425 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182370</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s cross-appeal in a case involving the disallowance of depreciation on data cables and Jodhpur property. The Tribunal upheld the higher rate of depreciation on data cables as computer peripherals, contrary to the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s decision. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the higher rate of depreciation on computer peripherals like printers and scanners, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s contention for a lower rate. The overall appeal against the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order resulted in partial relief for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 May 2016 17:23:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1425 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182370</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s cross-appeal in a case involving the disallowance of depreciation on data cables and Jodhpur property. The Tribunal upheld the higher rate of depreciation on data cables as computer peripherals, contrary to the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s decision. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the higher rate of depreciation on computer peripherals like printers and scanners, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s contention for a lower rate. The overall appeal against the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order resulted in partial relief for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>