<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1077 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182373</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all three grounds. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided ample evidence to support the sources of cash credits, the availability of stock, and the genuineness of rent expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 May 2016 17:23:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1077 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182373</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all three grounds. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided ample evidence to support the sources of cash credits, the availability of stock, and the genuineness of rent expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>