https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327299 The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of professional fees paid to Preroy AG and travelling expenses for Mrs. Neeta Premchand for the assessment years 1995-96, 1996-97, and 1997-98. The Tribunal found that the services purportedly rendered by Preroy AG were actually performed by a director of the assessee company, and there was no evidence that Mrs. Neeta Premchand's travel was solely for business purposes. The Tribunal dismissed all appeals, confirming the disallowances made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A). en-us Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 08 May 2016 17:21:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327299 The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of professional fees paid to Preroy AG and travelling expenses for Mrs. Neeta Premchand for the assessment years 1995-96, 1996-97, and 1997-98. The Tribunal found that the services purportedly rendered by Preroy AG were actually performed by a director of the assessee company, and there was no evidence that Mrs. Neeta Premchand's travel was solely for business purposes. The Tribunal dismissed all appeals, confirming the disallowances made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A). Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327299