<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 333 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182360</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the validity of the notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, ruling that the public purpose was not vague or malafide. The acquisition process was deemed lawful, dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 18:28:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 333 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182360</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the validity of the notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, ruling that the public purpose was not vague or malafide. The acquisition process was deemed lawful, dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>