<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 658 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182358</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the Orissa HC&#039;s decision, declaring the Orissa Medical Education Service (Appointment of Junior Teachers Validation) Act, 1993, ultra vires the Constitution. It ruled that the appointments of 49 Junior Teachers were illegal as they did not comply with the 1979 Rules. The Validating Act could not regularize these appointments without violating Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The Court dismissed the appeals, emphasizing that illegal appointments cannot be regularized without repealing or amending the 1979 Rules. The contempt petition and SLPs were disposed of, with costs borne by the parties themselves.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 658 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182358</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the Orissa HC&#039;s decision, declaring the Orissa Medical Education Service (Appointment of Junior Teachers Validation) Act, 1993, ultra vires the Constitution. It ruled that the appointments of 49 Junior Teachers were illegal as they did not comply with the 1979 Rules. The Validating Act could not regularize these appointments without violating Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. The Court dismissed the appeals, emphasizing that illegal appointments cannot be regularized without repealing or amending the 1979 Rules. The contempt petition and SLPs were disposed of, with costs borne by the parties themselves.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>