<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (9) TMI 181 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182356</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of land acquisition proceedings by a Municipality under the Hyderabad Land Acquisition Act for establishing a country fair or market, rejecting challenges to the &#039;public purpose&#039; and allegations of mala fide exercise of power. The Court found providing a village market to be a legitimate public purpose within municipal powers and dismissed claims of malus animus. It held that subsequent use of excess land for a housing colony did not invalidate the original acquisition, emphasizing that a valid compulsory acquisition remains unaffected by later diversion to a different public purpose. The appeal was ultimately dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (9) TMI 181 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182356</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of land acquisition proceedings by a Municipality under the Hyderabad Land Acquisition Act for establishing a country fair or market, rejecting challenges to the &#039;public purpose&#039; and allegations of mala fide exercise of power. The Court found providing a village market to be a legitimate public purpose within municipal powers and dismissed claims of malus animus. It held that subsequent use of excess land for a housing colony did not invalidate the original acquisition, emphasizing that a valid compulsory acquisition remains unaffected by later diversion to a different public purpose. The appeal was ultimately dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>