<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1098 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182355</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions on both issues. Regarding excess labour payments, the Tribunal confirmed a disallowance of Rs. 50,000, deleting the remaining Rs. 3,50,000 addition. Concerning the forward contract cancellation loss, the Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner that the contracts were not speculative but hedging transactions, allowing the loss as a business loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 17:51:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1098 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182355</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions on both issues. Regarding excess labour payments, the Tribunal confirmed a disallowance of Rs. 50,000, deleting the remaining Rs. 3,50,000 addition. Concerning the forward contract cancellation loss, the Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner that the contracts were not speculative but hedging transactions, allowing the loss as a business loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>