<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 667 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182354</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the Calcutta High Court&#039;s judgment and dismissing the writ petitions. It held that proper notice was served, the land requisition was for a public purpose, procedural requirements were met, and the land acquisition and transfer were valid. The Court emphasized the importance of providing housing to low and middle-income groups, supporting the State Government and Housing Board&#039;s actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 667 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182354</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the Calcutta High Court&#039;s judgment and dismissing the writ petitions. It held that proper notice was served, the land requisition was for a public purpose, procedural requirements were met, and the land acquisition and transfer were valid. The Court emphasized the importance of providing housing to low and middle-income groups, supporting the State Government and Housing Board&#039;s actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>