https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182352 A retrospective amendment to Rule 2544 of the Indian Railways Establishment Code, affecting the calculation of average emoluments and running allowances for pension, had already been held invalid for breach of Articles 14 and 16. On that basis, similarly situated employees were entitled to the same consequential pensionary relief, and delay in approaching the Tribunal should not stand in the way where the underlying entitlement had been judicially recognised. The Tribunal's dismissal was set aside, the application was allowed, and consequential pension benefits were granted. en-us Fri, 25 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 May 2016 17:12:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182352 A retrospective amendment to Rule 2544 of the Indian Railways Establishment Code, affecting the calculation of average emoluments and running allowances for pension, had already been held invalid for breach of Articles 14 and 16. On that basis, similarly situated employees were entitled to the same consequential pensionary relief, and delay in approaching the Tribunal should not stand in the way where the underlying entitlement had been judicially recognised. The Tribunal's dismissal was set aside, the application was allowed, and consequential pension benefits were granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182352