<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 614 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182333</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appellant&#039;s application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against an order by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. Despite claiming delayed knowledge of the Tribunal&#039;s decision, the appellant failed to provide evidence supporting this assertion. The Court found the appellant&#039;s explanation unsatisfactory, highlighting that the appellant should have received the order by October 2003 based on the Tribunal&#039;s dispatch confirmation. Additionally, the Court noted that the respondent had already received the refund before the appeal was filed, further weakening the appellant&#039;s case. Consequently, the Court dismissed both the application for condonation of delay and the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 14:17:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 614 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182333</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appellant&#039;s application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against an order by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. Despite claiming delayed knowledge of the Tribunal&#039;s decision, the appellant failed to provide evidence supporting this assertion. The Court found the appellant&#039;s explanation unsatisfactory, highlighting that the appellant should have received the order by October 2003 based on the Tribunal&#039;s dispatch confirmation. Additionally, the Court noted that the respondent had already received the refund before the appeal was filed, further weakening the appellant&#039;s case. Consequently, the Court dismissed both the application for condonation of delay and the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>