<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 899 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182331</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals on section 115JA deductions and provision for depreciation, while dismissing appeals on depreciation claims, restriction of deductions under sections 80HH, 80-I, and 80-IA, and VRS payments. The revenue&#039;s appeals on excise duty, sales tax exclusion, and notional interest were dismissed. The AO was directed to re-examine certain issues under section 80HHC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 14:11:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 899 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182331</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals on section 115JA deductions and provision for depreciation, while dismissing appeals on depreciation claims, restriction of deductions under sections 80HH, 80-I, and 80-IA, and VRS payments. The revenue&#039;s appeals on excise duty, sales tax exclusion, and notional interest were dismissed. The AO was directed to re-examine certain issues under section 80HHC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>