https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3382 A writ challenge to rejection of objections against attachment and garnishee proceedings is generally not maintainable where Rule 11(6) of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act provides an alternative statutory remedy by civil suit. After objections are rejected under Rule 11(5), the aggrieved party may sue to establish its right to the disputed property, and the Tax Recovery Officer's order remains subject to that suit. Because that remedy was available and effective, the writ court declined to interfere. en-us Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3382 A writ challenge to rejection of objections against attachment and garnishee proceedings is generally not maintainable where Rule 11(6) of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act provides an alternative statutory remedy by civil suit. After objections are rejected under Rule 11(5), the aggrieved party may sue to establish its right to the disputed property, and the Tax Recovery Officer's order remains subject to that suit. Because that remedy was available and effective, the writ court declined to interfere. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3382