<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 265 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327284</link>
    <description>The Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee by deleting various disallowances and additions made by the Assessing Officer. The issues were remitted back to the AO for fresh adjudication, aligning with precedents and ensuring proper application of tax provisions. The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the FAA, referencing past cases and legal principles to support the deletions and adjustments in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 14:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 265 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327284</link>
      <description>The Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee by deleting various disallowances and additions made by the Assessing Officer. The issues were remitted back to the AO for fresh adjudication, aligning with precedents and ensuring proper application of tax provisions. The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the FAA, referencing past cases and legal principles to support the deletions and adjustments in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>