<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 264 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327283</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s decision that the transfer of the BOPP Films undertaking constituted a slump sale, resulting in the taxation of capital gains. The issue of computing deduction under Section 80HHC was remanded to the AO for reconsideration based on previous directions. The appeal regarding corporate dividend tax was dismissed as it was not pursued by the assessee. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal with the order pronounced on 29/04/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 19:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 264 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327283</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s decision that the transfer of the BOPP Films undertaking constituted a slump sale, resulting in the taxation of capital gains. The issue of computing deduction under Section 80HHC was remanded to the AO for reconsideration based on previous directions. The appeal regarding corporate dividend tax was dismissed as it was not pursued by the assessee. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal with the order pronounced on 29/04/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>