<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 263 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327282</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by remanding the car expense issue back to the Assessing Officer for verification. The enhanced rental income assessment was confirmed, with maintenance charges allowed as deductible. The Tribunal emphasized the distinction between the assessee and the entities renting the properties, upholding the estimation of rental values based on fair rent expectations. The decision in a precedent case was deemed inapplicable due to differing facts. The order was pronounced on April 29, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 11:52:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 263 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327282</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by remanding the car expense issue back to the Assessing Officer for verification. The enhanced rental income assessment was confirmed, with maintenance charges allowed as deductible. The Tribunal emphasized the distinction between the assessee and the entities renting the properties, upholding the estimation of rental values based on fair rent expectations. The decision in a precedent case was deemed inapplicable due to differing facts. The order was pronounced on April 29, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>