<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 255 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327274</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, excluding reimbursement costs from operating costs and remanding the arm&#039;s length price determination to the AO for verification. The appeal of the revenue was also partly allowed, affirming the acceptance of additional evidence and deletion of ad hoc disallowance of personal expenses. The tribunal&#039;s decisions were in line with previous rulings and legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 255 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327274</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, excluding reimbursement costs from operating costs and remanding the arm&#039;s length price determination to the AO for verification. The appeal of the revenue was also partly allowed, affirming the acceptance of additional evidence and deletion of ad hoc disallowance of personal expenses. The tribunal&#039;s decisions were in line with previous rulings and legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>