<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 251 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327270</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions regarding the treatment of trial run receipts and subsidy received, considering them as revenue items and reducing the cost of fixed assets, respectively. However, the Tribunal deleted the penalties imposed on the assessee, citing technical breaches without concealment of income or inaccurate particulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 251 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327270</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions regarding the treatment of trial run receipts and subsidy received, considering them as revenue items and reducing the cost of fixed assets, respectively. However, the Tribunal deleted the penalties imposed on the assessee, citing technical breaches without concealment of income or inaccurate particulars.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>