<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 250 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327269</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 but found that the disallowance of depreciation on the bio-gas plants was not conclusively proved by the lower authorities. The matter was restored to the AO for fresh consideration. The Tribunal also upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c), finding no justification for the penalty based on the evidences presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 11:16:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 250 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327269</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 but found that the disallowance of depreciation on the bio-gas plants was not conclusively proved by the lower authorities. The matter was restored to the AO for fresh consideration. The Tribunal also upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c), finding no justification for the penalty based on the evidences presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>