<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 234 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327253</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The judgment highlighted the significance of the bonafide nature of claims and the voluntary disclosure of errors by taxpayers in determining the applicability of penalties under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 11:15:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 234 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327253</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The judgment highlighted the significance of the bonafide nature of claims and the voluntary disclosure of errors by taxpayers in determining the applicability of penalties under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>