https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327248 A litigant who secures bail on the basis of an undertaking and then fails to honour it cannot claim discretionary writ relief under Article 226 because such conduct shows lack of bona fides and breach of clean-hands principles. The Court also treated the departmental remand action as proper where there were repeated defaults in payment of declared service tax dues, rejection of some declarations, and non-compliance with the extended payment time. It noted that collected service tax had to be deposited to the Central Government and that failure to do so attracted the statutory recovery and penal framework under the Finance Act, 1994. en-us Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327248 A litigant who secures bail on the basis of an undertaking and then fails to honour it cannot claim discretionary writ relief under Article 226 because such conduct shows lack of bona fides and breach of clean-hands principles. The Court also treated the departmental remand action as proper where there were repeated defaults in payment of declared service tax dues, rejection of some declarations, and non-compliance with the extended payment time. It noted that collected service tax had to be deposited to the Central Government and that failure to do so attracted the statutory recovery and penal framework under the Finance Act, 1994. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327248