<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1179 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by reducing the net profit rate from 10% to 9% for the appellant in the civil contract business. This decision was based on the appellant&#039;s failure to provide necessary documentation and verification for expenses and creditors, aligning with the principle that profit estimation should be rational and consider relevant factors. The Tribunal&#039;s judgment aimed to strike a balance between fair profit assessment and the appellant&#039;s lack of compliance with documentation requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 10:29:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=427207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1179 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by reducing the net profit rate from 10% to 9% for the appellant in the civil contract business. This decision was based on the appellant&#039;s failure to provide necessary documentation and verification for expenses and creditors, aligning with the principle that profit estimation should be rational and consider relevant factors. The Tribunal&#039;s judgment aimed to strike a balance between fair profit assessment and the appellant&#039;s lack of compliance with documentation requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>