<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 100 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3367</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the excess stock found during a survey operation did not entitle the assessee to claim a deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that the burden of proof to establish eligibility for the deduction lay with the assessee, and the surrender of income alone was insufficient to qualify for the deduction. The judgment clarified that specific conditions must be met to claim the deduction, and in this case, the surrendered amount could not be considered as income from exports.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 100 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3367</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the excess stock found during a survey operation did not entitle the assessee to claim a deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that the burden of proof to establish eligibility for the deduction lay with the assessee, and the surrender of income alone was insufficient to qualify for the deduction. The judgment clarified that specific conditions must be met to claim the deduction, and in this case, the surrendered amount could not be considered as income from exports.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>