<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 23 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3361</link>
    <description>For assessment years 1991-92 to 1997-98, SC upheld the High Court and dismissed the civil appeals, holding that assessees who had previously followed and had Departmental acceptance of the completed-contract method for chit-fund accounting need not be compelled to adopt percentage-of-completion unless the method distorts profits. The Court found the proposed change to treat chit discount as deferred revenue expenditure to be revenue neutral in these cases, and declined to disturb the accepted accounting approach; the Department remains free to apply new standards in future cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 23 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3361</link>
      <description>For assessment years 1991-92 to 1997-98, SC upheld the High Court and dismissed the civil appeals, holding that assessees who had previously followed and had Departmental acceptance of the completed-contract method for chit-fund accounting need not be compelled to adopt percentage-of-completion unless the method distorts profits. The Court found the proposed change to treat chit discount as deferred revenue expenditure to be revenue neutral in these cases, and declined to disturb the accepted accounting approach; the Department remains free to apply new standards in future cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>