<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3356</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals on the ground of limitation as the extended period could not be invoked due to the absence of collusion or willful misstatement by the respondent. Consequently, the demand and penalty imposed on the respondent were dropped.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3356</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals on the ground of limitation as the extended period could not be invoked due to the absence of collusion or willful misstatement by the respondent. Consequently, the demand and penalty imposed on the respondent were dropped.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>