<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 3 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3352</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to restrict the Assessee&#039;s depreciation claim under Section 38(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessee&#039;s assets were not deemed to be exclusively used for business purposes due to a transfer of 85% of sales to another party. The Tribunal found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeal, affirming that the Assessee did not utilize its fixed assets solely for its business, leading to the restriction of the depreciation claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 3 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3352</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to restrict the Assessee&#039;s depreciation claim under Section 38(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessee&#039;s assets were not deemed to be exclusively used for business purposes due to a transfer of 85% of sales to another party. The Tribunal found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeal, affirming that the Assessee did not utilize its fixed assets solely for its business, leading to the restriction of the depreciation claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>