<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 1 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3350</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of undisclosed income based on a commission payment, finding it was recorded before the search and in regular returns. The court emphasized that undisclosed income should stem from previously undisclosed evidence, and any false claim must be directly linked to uncovered evidence. Despite the Revenue&#039;s request for reevaluation, the court dismissed the appeal, stating no substantial question of law arose from the findings and evidence presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 1 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3350</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of undisclosed income based on a commission payment, finding it was recorded before the search and in regular returns. The court emphasized that undisclosed income should stem from previously undisclosed evidence, and any false claim must be directly linked to uncovered evidence. Despite the Revenue&#039;s request for reevaluation, the court dismissed the appeal, stating no substantial question of law arose from the findings and evidence presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>