<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 624 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182285</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order under section 263, determining that the assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of revenue. It found that the AO had adequately examined the relevant details, including gifts, losses, and deductions. The Tribunal concluded that the CIT&#039;s reliance on conjecture and surmise was unjustified, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 624 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182285</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order under section 263, determining that the assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of revenue. It found that the AO had adequately examined the relevant details, including gifts, losses, and deductions. The Tribunal concluded that the CIT&#039;s reliance on conjecture and surmise was unjustified, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>