<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 521 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182272</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals of the Revenue, upholding the decisions of the ld. CIT(A) to delete the penalties u/s 271AA and 271G for Assessment Year 2006-07. The Tribunal found the reasons for the delay in document submission, attributed to the resignation of the company secretary, to be valid and reasonable, thereby supporting the deletion of penalties. The decision was also backed by a previous ruling of the Tribunal in a similar case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 521 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182272</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals of the Revenue, upholding the decisions of the ld. CIT(A) to delete the penalties u/s 271AA and 271G for Assessment Year 2006-07. The Tribunal found the reasons for the delay in document submission, attributed to the resignation of the company secretary, to be valid and reasonable, thereby supporting the deletion of penalties. The decision was also backed by a previous ruling of the Tribunal in a similar case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>