<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 204 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327223</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the application of section 40A(3) in disallowing deductions for cash purchases of gold jewellery exceeding the specified limit, as found during search operations, and dismissed the appeal challenging the disallowance in the computation of undisclosed income for the block period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 11:55:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 204 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327223</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the application of section 40A(3) in disallowing deductions for cash purchases of gold jewellery exceeding the specified limit, as found during search operations, and dismissed the appeal challenging the disallowance in the computation of undisclosed income for the block period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>