<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 198 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327217</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the transfer pricing adjustment issue back to the AO/TPO for fresh determination. Infosys Ltd. and TCS Ltd. were excluded from comparables, while Bodhtree Consulting Ltd. was upheld. Working capital adjustment was allowed based on annual figures. The deduction under Section 10AA was granted, overturning the AO&#039;s denial. The appeal was partly allowed, directing various adjustments and exclusions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 198 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327217</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the transfer pricing adjustment issue back to the AO/TPO for fresh determination. Infosys Ltd. and TCS Ltd. were excluded from comparables, while Bodhtree Consulting Ltd. was upheld. Working capital adjustment was allowed based on annual figures. The deduction under Section 10AA was granted, overturning the AO&#039;s denial. The appeal was partly allowed, directing various adjustments and exclusions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>