https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3335 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of diamonds under Section 111(o) for attempting to remove them from the SEEPZ unit against notification conditions but reduced the fine. The confiscation of the vehicle was set aside. Penalties imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) were upheld. The appeals were partly allowed, confirming the confiscation of diamonds but reducing the fine and setting aside the vehicle confiscation based on specific circumstances. en-us Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3335 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of diamonds under Section 111(o) for attempting to remove them from the SEEPZ unit against notification conditions but reduced the fine. The confiscation of the vehicle was set aside. Penalties imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) were upheld. The appeals were partly allowed, confirming the confiscation of diamonds but reducing the fine and setting aside the vehicle confiscation based on specific circumstances. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3335