<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 698 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182252</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 36(1)(iii) for proportionate expenditure allocable to work in progress forming part of closing stock was in issue. The Bombay HC followed its earlier order in the assessee&#039;s own case on the same question and dismissed the appeal. The text indicates that the claim for deduction was not accepted on the identical issue already decided against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 11:31:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 698 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182252</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 36(1)(iii) for proportionate expenditure allocable to work in progress forming part of closing stock was in issue. The Bombay HC followed its earlier order in the assessee&#039;s own case on the same question and dismissed the appeal. The text indicates that the claim for deduction was not accepted on the identical issue already decided against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>