<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 191 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327210</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the dismissal of the appeal by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal due to a significant delay of 997 days. The Court emphasized the importance of complying with legal requirements and rejected the appellant&#039;s argument of misunderstanding as a valid reason for condonation of the delay. The Court ruled that ignorance of the law is not an excuse for failing to adhere to legal timelines, and as such, upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 10:46:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 191 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327210</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the dismissal of the appeal by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal due to a significant delay of 997 days. The Court emphasized the importance of complying with legal requirements and rejected the appellant&#039;s argument of misunderstanding as a valid reason for condonation of the delay. The Court ruled that ignorance of the law is not an excuse for failing to adhere to legal timelines, and as such, upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>