<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 186 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327205</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962, finding no contravention by the appellant and incorrect application of the penalty provision. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order against the appellant was overturned, granting any consequential relief as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 23:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 186 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327205</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962, finding no contravention by the appellant and incorrect application of the penalty provision. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order against the appellant was overturned, granting any consequential relief as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>