<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1218 - Chattisgarh High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182230</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the search warrant issued under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It found that there were sufficient materials in possession of the Directorate General of Income Tax (Investigation) to justify the issuance of the warrant, rejecting claims of lack of material for forming reasons to believe in undisclosed income or property. Allegations of malafide intention and violation of privacy were also dismissed, with the court emphasizing the objective basis required for forming such beliefs. The petitioner&#039;s claim of immunity due to professional excellence was rejected, and procedural issues raised were not upheld, leading to the dismissal of the petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1218 - Chattisgarh High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182230</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the search warrant issued under section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It found that there were sufficient materials in possession of the Directorate General of Income Tax (Investigation) to justify the issuance of the warrant, rejecting claims of lack of material for forming reasons to believe in undisclosed income or property. Allegations of malafide intention and violation of privacy were also dismissed, with the court emphasizing the objective basis required for forming such beliefs. The petitioner&#039;s claim of immunity due to professional excellence was rejected, and procedural issues raised were not upheld, leading to the dismissal of the petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>