https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182213 The Tribunal revoked the suspension of the CHA license under Regulation 20(3) of CHALR, 2004, citing the significant time lapse between the events as not constituting an emergency warranting immediate suspension. The appellant's argument that the delay of over four years did not warrant immediate suspension was upheld, and the Tribunal directed Customs authorities to expedite the enquiry against the appellant-CHA in accordance with the law, following a precedent set by the Bombay High Court in a similar case. en-us Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 May 2016 11:07:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182213 The Tribunal revoked the suspension of the CHA license under Regulation 20(3) of CHALR, 2004, citing the significant time lapse between the events as not constituting an emergency warranting immediate suspension. The appellant's argument that the delay of over four years did not warrant immediate suspension was upheld, and the Tribunal directed Customs authorities to expedite the enquiry against the appellant-CHA in accordance with the law, following a precedent set by the Bombay High Court in a similar case. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182213