<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 888 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182205</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT(Appeals) in favor of the assessee, determining that the indexed cost of acquisition for long term capital gains should be calculated based on the year when the property was first held by the previous owner. By aligning with legal precedents emphasizing the period of holding by the previous owner, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the assessee&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 10:34:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 888 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182205</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT(Appeals) in favor of the assessee, determining that the indexed cost of acquisition for long term capital gains should be calculated based on the year when the property was first held by the previous owner. By aligning with legal precedents emphasizing the period of holding by the previous owner, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the assessee&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>