<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 180 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327199</link>
    <description>Refund of accumulated Cenvat credit arising from export of services could not be denied on limitation or on the ground that an additional premises was not registered, because Section 11B limitation was held inapplicable and registration was not treated as a statutory precondition where the credit belonged to the assessee and the services were exported without tax. Customs clearing services and allied business-related services were also treated as eligible input services under the wide Cenvat Credit definition, supporting refund of the related credit. The impugned order was set aside and the refund claims were allowed in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 16:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 180 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327199</link>
      <description>Refund of accumulated Cenvat credit arising from export of services could not be denied on limitation or on the ground that an additional premises was not registered, because Section 11B limitation was held inapplicable and registration was not treated as a statutory precondition where the credit belonged to the assessee and the services were exported without tax. Customs clearing services and allied business-related services were also treated as eligible input services under the wide Cenvat Credit definition, supporting refund of the related credit. The impugned order was set aside and the refund claims were allowed in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>