<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 179 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327198</link>
    <description>The court allowed the modification application for delayed deposit, confirming the deposit made by the appellant. The interpretation of Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, was discussed, emphasizing the power of the court to extend time for compliance. The court noted substantial compliance by the appellant with its orders and directed the Tribunal to treat the appeal as restored for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 179 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327198</link>
      <description>The court allowed the modification application for delayed deposit, confirming the deposit made by the appellant. The interpretation of Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, was discussed, emphasizing the power of the court to extend time for compliance. The court noted substantial compliance by the appellant with its orders and directed the Tribunal to treat the appeal as restored for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>