<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 174 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327193</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, finding that the Appellants had provided enough evidence of the gold&#039;s lawful acquisition and that the Revenue had failed to establish it was smuggled. The Tribunal criticized the Adjudicating authority for inadequate investigation and lack of procedural fairness. The Appellants were granted consequential reliefs, and the order was pronounced in open court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 16:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 174 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327193</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, finding that the Appellants had provided enough evidence of the gold&#039;s lawful acquisition and that the Revenue had failed to establish it was smuggled. The Tribunal criticized the Adjudicating authority for inadequate investigation and lack of procedural fairness. The Appellants were granted consequential reliefs, and the order was pronounced in open court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>