<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 173 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327192</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on Shri Kishore Shah under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, due to his active involvement in monitoring smuggling activities and facilitating duty payments. However, the penalty imposed on Shri Pravin Gada was set aside as he delegated operations and claimed ignorance of smuggling, giving him the benefit of the doubt. The Tribunal distinguished the case from legal precedents cited by the appellants&#039; counsel, emphasizing the intent to smuggle restricted items. Shri Pravin Gada&#039;s appeal was allowed, while Shri Kishore Shah&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 173 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327192</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on Shri Kishore Shah under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, due to his active involvement in monitoring smuggling activities and facilitating duty payments. However, the penalty imposed on Shri Pravin Gada was set aside as he delegated operations and claimed ignorance of smuggling, giving him the benefit of the doubt. The Tribunal distinguished the case from legal precedents cited by the appellants&#039; counsel, emphasizing the intent to smuggle restricted items. Shri Pravin Gada&#039;s appeal was allowed, while Shri Kishore Shah&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>