<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 123 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3320</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the duty confirmation on unredeemed seized goods, confiscation of finished goods and raw materials, and duty demand on raw materials. The appellants were directed to pay duty on finished goods upon clearance. A reduced penalty of Rs. 2,000 was imposed for record-keeping lapses, with the penalty on the Director set aside. The Tribunal found the authorities&#039; actions unjustified and clarified excise law principles on duty, confiscation, and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 123 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3320</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the duty confirmation on unredeemed seized goods, confiscation of finished goods and raw materials, and duty demand on raw materials. The appellants were directed to pay duty on finished goods upon clearance. A reduced penalty of Rs. 2,000 was imposed for record-keeping lapses, with the penalty on the Director set aside. The Tribunal found the authorities&#039; actions unjustified and clarified excise law principles on duty, confiscation, and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>