<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 160 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327179</link>
    <description>For capital gains purposes, the transfer date was taken from the registered sale deed rather than an earlier notarized agreement to sell, because the deed recorded delivery of possession and was preferred over conflicting unsupported assertions. Capital gains were therefore taxable in the relevant assessment year. On the separate valuation issue, the adopted fair market value as on 01/04/1981 was found to lack adequate basis, and the matter was remitted for fresh determination after allowing the assessee to produce evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2016 00:49:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=426707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 160 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327179</link>
      <description>For capital gains purposes, the transfer date was taken from the registered sale deed rather than an earlier notarized agreement to sell, because the deed recorded delivery of possession and was preferred over conflicting unsupported assertions. Capital gains were therefore taxable in the relevant assessment year. On the separate valuation issue, the adopted fair market value as on 01/04/1981 was found to lack adequate basis, and the matter was remitted for fresh determination after allowing the assessee to produce evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=327179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>